On Sunday 20 July 2003 13:23, Oded Arbel wrote: > On Sunday 20 July 2003 14:39, Alexander Malysh wrote: > > I can not undestand , why this change should be done? We use msg id only > > for our internally purposes and msg id has nothing todo with provider msg > > id... Can you please explain why it should be needed ? > > Several providers required that we respond with a message identified that > can be tracked, when a message is being sent to Kannel. using the kannel > internal message id for that purpose is much easier then most other message > tracking methods. this Id is usually required to be 64bit in length.
do you speek now about smsbox's sendsms interface? then we should change Counter, in order to be able to handle long long... and why not just use timestamp+msgid ? unix timestamp is long and also msg id is long , so you have required 64bit ? and it would be better msg id tracking (imo), bacause you have additional timestamp for this msg... -- Best regards / Mit besten Gr��en aus D�sseldorf Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___________________________________________ Centrium GmbH Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 D�sseldorf Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80 Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109 email: a.malysh at centrium.de web: www.centrium.de msn: olek2002 at hotmail.com icq: 98063111 ___________________________________________ Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
