> ok, this can be considered as *general* problem. As with TON/NPI for > SMPP (ie.) it's desirable to set SMPP parameters specifically on > message basis. But we don't want to "overload" smsbox interface with > smsc specific parameter handling. (btw, Kannel's msg structure is > anyway not designed for this purpose). > > So we have to resolve issues down on the smsc specific layer. ... > Any comments on this?
I think this would be a much better solution that handling it on the smsbox interface, as it would make multiple configurations a lot easier on the client side (ie. setup a new username to use a different profile id / fixed sender, etc....
