Hi list,

we seem to have a problem with our Dict (dictionary hash). When
putting a lot of objects in there and lookin into how many we have, we
get wrong results, see attached.

Stipe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 D�sseldorf

Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are
--- Begin Message ---
The following NEW bug has been ADDED.
=======================================================================
http://bugs.kannel.org/view_bug_page.php?f_id=77
=======================================================================
Reporter:                   tolj
Handler:                    
=======================================================================
Project:                    Kannel
Bug ID:                     0000077
Category:                   General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   high
Status:                     new
=======================================================================
Date Submitted:             08-11-03 13:07 BST
Last Modified:              08-11-03 13:07 BST
=======================================================================
Summary:                    gwlib/dict.c seems to loose entries in the Dict structure
Description: 
When insert a huge ammount of objects into an Dict, some seem to get
lost:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] gateway]# ./test/test_dict
2003-08-11 14:01:13 [0] DEBUG: Dict simple test.
2003-08-11 14:01:13 [0] INFO: foo gives bar
2003-08-11 14:01:13 [0] INFO: there is but one foo.
2003-08-11 14:01:13 [0] DEBUG: Dict extended/huge test.
2003-08-11 14:02:54 [0] ERROR: key count is 99997, should be 100000.
2003-08-11 14:02:54 [0] DEBUG: Immutable octet strings: 2.
=======================================================================


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to