On Thursday 11 September 2003 14:06, Yury Mikhienko wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > please note: values for the mclass/coding were changed. Please use values
> > in the range: coding[0-2], mclass[0-3].
>
> From latest version and above?

it's in cvs only and will be in upcomming 1.3.2 ...

>
> > Bruno, would you like to update the usergiude to reflect changes made by
> > you?
> >
> > > In last CVS version of kannel data_coding field in PDU wrong
> > > calculating
> > >
> > > For example, I set the following headers
> > >    if(!response.containsHeader("X-Kannel-Coding"))
> > >    {
> > >     response.addHeader("X-Kannel-Coding",new String("2"));
> > >    }else
> > >    {
> > >     response.setHeader("X-Kannel-Coding",new String("2"));
> > >    };
> >
> > is it really UCS2 ?
>
> No, but I think about the following (from kannel coding note):
> 0 - Default
> 1 - 7bit
> 2 - 8bit
> 3 - UCS2

the usergiude is not updated yet...
the values are (look in gw/sms.h):
#define DC_7BIT   0
#define DC_8BIT   1
#define DC_UCS2   2


>
> but in SMPP Protocol Specification v3.4 notice the following
>
> 00000000 SMSC Default Alphabet
> 00000001 IA5
> 00000010 Octet unspecifed (8-bit binary)
> 00000011 Latin1 (ISO-8859-1)
> ...
> 00001000 UCS2
>
> > >    if(!response.containsHeader("X-Kannel-MClass"))
> > >    {
> > >     response.addHeader("X-Kannel-MClass","1");
> > >    }else
> > >    {
> > >     response.setHeader("X-Kannel-MClass","1");
> > >    };
> >
> > do you really want mclass = FAX ?

oops, my fault, I thought, mwi :)

>
> What you mean?
> I want get the flash SMS

it's mclass=0 now ...

Good luck!

-- 
Best regards / Mit besten Gr��en aus D�sseldorf

Dipl.-Ing.
Alexander Malysh
___________________________________________

Centrium GmbH
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 D�sseldorf

Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80
Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109

email: a.malysh at centrium.de
web: www.centrium.de
msn: olek2002 at hotmail.com
icq: 98063111
___________________________________________

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html


Reply via email to