Alan McNatty wrote:
>
> Just a question really. I've been looking at the X-Kannel headers and
> noted that if you receive an MO message from SMSC 'A' and you specify
> the message should go back via SMSC 'A' for normal short message fine.
> However if you respond with content with content that gets split. The
> first fragment goes through the correct SMSC ('A') but the other
> fragments get sent in normal load-balancing fashion.
>
> Should all content go through the specified SMSC or is the current
> implementation by design?
yep. All split message parts should go throuigh that specific smsc-id.
If they don't then this can be considered as a bug.
Please add a bug report to http://bugs.kannel.org/ and include some
bearerbox/smsbox log lines to show the behaviour. The better you
describe, the faster we get it fixed. Thanks in advance.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG
M�nsterstr. 248
40470 D�sseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin)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=aYCI
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
