hey, factor 50???? I want see a patch w/o YAT!!! It can't be soooo bad... On Thursday 27 November 2003 17:24, David Schmitz wrote: > Hi, > > your YAT-hatred ;) is well known and understood. See the attachment for > some naive benchmarks. Please draw your own conclusions. > > Regards, > David > > Alexander Malysh schrieb: > >Hi David/Slava, > > > >as you know, I do not like "yet another thread" (YAT) approach... > >Would you please try get some benchmark results w/ and w/o YAT, so we can > > see how is performance w/o YAT affected? > > > >Thanks in advance... > > > >On Thursday 27 November 2003 15:02, David Schmitz wrote: > >>Hi list, > >> > >>attached is the IMHO final version of the timeout-patch. I took the > >>thread-approach as discussed with Slava (thanks for your input and help > >> > >>:)). If there are no objections/corrections I would like to commit the > >> > >>patch. > >> > >>Note: configuration of the timeout-values is done in http.h. > >> > >>Best regards, > >>David
-- Best regards / Mit besten Gr��en aus D�sseldorf Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___________________________________________ Centrium GmbH Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 D�sseldorf Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80 Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.centrium.de msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 98063111 ___________________________________________ Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
