Hi,

I believe, it's correct... alt_dcs just indicate 0xFX coding and for those 2 
cases we have 0x0X coding...

On Wednesday 03 December 2003 16:46, Paul Keogh wrote:
> In sms.c,
>
> int dcs_to_fields(Msg **msg, int dcs)
>
> There are 2 instances of
>
> (*msg)->sms.alt_dcs = 0;
>
> I think this is wrong  and should be
>
> (*msg)->sms.alt_dcs = SMS_PARAM_UNDEFINED;
>
> as 0 is no longer used to indicate that the service is not required.
>
> Paul Keogh
> ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
> http://www.anam.com
> +353 1 284 7555 (wired)               +353 86 234 6047 (wireless)
> Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland

-- 
Best regards / Mit besten Gr��en aus D�sseldorf

Dipl.-Ing.
Alexander Malysh
___________________________________________

Centrium GmbH
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 D�sseldorf

Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80
Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.centrium.de
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 98063111
___________________________________________

Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html


Reply via email to