DILWORTH MICHAEL wrote: > > Hi all > > I am wondering if anyone can shed some light on what I am seeing. When > sending SMS or OTA messages using sendsms or sendota programmatically I > was specifying HTTP as version 1.1. I was seeing up to 20 seconds for > the request to complete. > > When I changed this request to use HTTP 1.0 the speed up was dramatic, > almost instant. > > Is 1.1 supported? > > I am thinking that because 1.1 uses persistent connections to speed up > the download of many items over the one tcp connection then it isnt of > much use to these kannel features as everything should be done over the > 1 hit. > > Anyhow, on this note dos anyone have any performance information of just > what kannel can handle in terms of hitting sendsms and sendota?
David may shed some light on this. He has worked strastically with the http module?! Stipe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG M�nsterstr. 248 40470 D�sseldorf, NRW, Germany phone: +49.211.74845.0 fax: +49.211.74845.299 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wapme-systems.de/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin) mIsEP6mcYwEEAMDnUiUwrbb+xwTFWN6TxF2+XZu7/alwJMeCwMBRvXtPZqfjpPhS OkBpU0F4TrVuugz1HINTSaJTYq10AzDQXp5NkyWgckqW79nPAWuOX0dicbJk+cN2 nM2TI4KaxUDe6u8hghNEnH/i2lXsUu9apnP/iixzV81VC2je3uc9hZpnAAYptEVT dGlwZSBUb2xqIChUZWNobm9sb2d5IENlbnRlciAmIFJlc2VhcmNoIExhYikgPHRv bGpAd2FwbWUtc3lzdGVtcy5kZT6ItAQTAQIAHgUCP6mcYwIbAwYLCQgHAwIDFQID AxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRABV0w1BqPYRuSqA/wPzsQxao2YePENCtgRTrO86U6zg3sl OcS6CJFI4FZP5h/xD3GRsNH1+MPSvZlomDdpFnr547DGz/Kq9MXuQwVvlVig5yWZ K5dtKp1r5YLhxJQBhfirZbRFFnYmf19f18J8OoS28tuFVftDl1AIwJS3HLyBTv6H g2HyLAEKQIp30Q== =aYCI -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
