Hi, reading your patch I'm wondering, why posgresql supports 'limit 1' for update/select sql statements and not for delete? is it really the case?! sorry I'm too lazy to google yet ;)
On Friday 07 May 2004 17:13, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Hi, > > In current sdb driver for dlr's, when using postgres the queries > are totally ignoring the "limit" argument (that will be still > necessary until we don't have a way to disambiguate between > messages, such as was suggested by Nicholas Rahn some time ago > for example). The following short patch allows sdb queries > aimed at postgres to correctly limit the results. -- Best regards / Mit besten Gr��en aus D�sseldorf Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___________________________________________ Centrium GmbH Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 D�sseldorf Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80 Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109 email: a.malysh (at) centrium.de web: www.centrium.de msn: a.malysh (at) centrium.de icq: 98063111 ___________________________________________ Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
pgpuWCdszhYWu.pgp
Description: signature
