Pedro B. wrote:

... which is a pity. I was recently asked if i was willing to do a
migration from another gateway -a fairly good one, also in C, but
commercial and not open-source, although they have a trial available for
who wants to better know it - i wonder if saying the name here is
forbidden ;)

no, this is an open forum, so this is not forbidden.

But with the scenario they painted was something like: there is a .so
shared object (they really want to guarantee multi threading) that
controls all events occuring in the gateway - connects, reconnects,
status messages, MO, MT. Meaning everytime one of these events occur,
that same .so is triggered, and from there everything is controlled,
from the database tasks (pgsql, with a sh**load of triggers to control
the custom mobile marketing campaigns) to the .php that generates the
push SI binaries and MMS stuff (nuts, no PPG).

why? Using a PPG for transmitting the MMS notifications is of course "the clean way". But our MMSC has also the ability to push MMS notifications directly via SMS.


Basically this makes more sense, in terms when you really want to control what kind of PDU you want to be transmitted to the phone. In case the PPG has a way of sending the notification PDU that some phones don't like.

In overall, i felt i was not 100% at ease with a migration like this, so
 i still didn't give them an answer. Of course that if some kind of
commercial support was available, i would be a middle man in the
migration, but as it is now... tough decision.

The lack in commercial support commitment is not due to "not willing". It's more due to the fact that the business model is to weak (in terms of revenues).


Stipe

mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 D�sseldorf, NRW, Germany

phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299

mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin)
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=aYCI
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----



Reply via email to