Hi,

yes you should switch to cvs version... cvs version should be stable as
1.3.2

Rodrigo A. Cremaschi wrote:

> 
> Hi list,
> 
> Kannel 1.3.2 panics after trying to send a message with source_addr: NULL,
> destination_addr: NULL and sequence_number=0
> I have seen this issue reported earlier. I'm in production state. Should I
> move to CVS?
> This happens randomly with (as far as I know) two of my SMSC's.
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[UNIFON]: Got PDU:
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x8188200 dump:
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   type_name: deliver_sm
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   command_id: 5 = 0x00000005
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 0 = 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   service_type: NULL
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 0 = 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   source_addr: NULL
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 0 = 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 0 = 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: NULL
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   esm_class: 0 = 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 =
> 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0 =
> 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   data_coding: 0 = 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x00000000
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   sm_length: 99 = 0x00000063
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:   short_message:
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:    Octet string at 0x81a28e0:
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:      len:  99
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:      size: 100
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:      immutable: 0
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:      data: 45 6e 20 63 75 61 6c 20
> 64
> 65 20 6c 61 73 20 73   En cual de las s
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:      data: 69 67 75 69 65 6e 74 65
> 73
> 20 64 69 73 63 69 70   iguientes discip
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:      data: 6c 69 6e 61 73 20 6e 6f
> 20
> 73 65 20 6f 74 6f 72   linas no se otor
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:      data: 67 61 20 65 6c 20 50 72
> 65
> 6d 69 6f 20 4e 6f 62   ga el Premio Nob
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:      data: 65 6c 3f 20 46 2d 46 69
> 73
> 69 63 61 2f 50 2d 50   el? F-Fisica/P-P
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:      data: 65 72 69 6f 64 69 73 6d
> 6f
> 2f 51 2d 51 75 69 6d   eriodismo/Q-Quim
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:      data: 69 63 61
> ica
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG:    Octet string dump ends.
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
> 2004-09-09 13:17:21 [11753] [8] PANIC: gwlib/octstr.c:2326:
> seems_valid_real: Assertion `ostr != NULL' failed. (Called from gw
> lib/octstr.c:807:octstr_check_range.)
> 
> 
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> informaci�n CONFIDENCIAL sometida a secreto profesional o cuya divulgaci�n
> est� prohibida en virtud de la legislaci�n vigente. Si ha recibido este
> mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta
> misma v�a o por tel�fono (54.11 5776-5000) y proceda a su destrucci�n.
> N�tese que el correo electr�nico v�a Internet no permite asegurar ni la
> confidencialidad de los mensajes que se transmiten ni la correcta
> recepci�n de los mismos. En caso de que el destinatario de este mensaje no
> consintiera la utilizaci�n de correo electr�nico v�a Internet rogamos lo
> ponga en nuestro conocimiento de manera inmediata.

-- 
Thanks,
Alex


Reply via email to