Hi Kalle, > Ah, very true. I do not know what I was thinking, maybe this idea that > 'some operators do not support DLRs' made me think that these messages > will not be gained either.. but I check of code confirmed that they > are not linked, so the procedure you described sounds good.
That's true and that's why long time ago a small patch for CIMD driver was provided to have an additional no-dlr option in the configuration file. It was because operator even did not accept anything _about_ DLR. In such case IMHO SMSC's reply "accepted" would sound reasonable to signal sendsms about the "almost successful" delivery of SM. regards, Dziugas Baltrunas
