Kalle Marjola wrote:
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 06:25, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
I'd suggest you to use 1.3.2. It is as stable as 1.2.1 but it's a lot more functional.
This reminds: could we get new stable release at some point? (new devel release wouldn't hurt that much either ... no matter if there has not been many updates, we could simply say like '1.3.3 is almost like 1.3.2, no need to upgrade unless...)
Maybe just release 1.3.2 as 1.4.0, perhaps with some little patches.. (is there?) This way more probably we would get rid of 1.2.x based problems on lists.
yep, agreed. People still tend to pick 1.2.1 since it is "stable" rather then 1.3.2 devel... and that one is "way beyond" more stable then 1.2.1.
I'll go for 1.4.0 stable today and release it... if no short-cut objections here.
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 D�sseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0 fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de http://www.wapme-systems.de/ -------------------------------------------------------------------
