While you mentioned the APR: would it make sense to port gwlib to the APR (Step 1) and then move to APR completely?
Regards Joerg -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 12:45 An: Rene Kluwen Cc: [email protected] Betreff: Re: Looking to open source software that uses gwlib Rene Kluwen wrote: > Because I know that gwlib serves more purposes than just Kannel: How about > creating a seperate CVS tree for it and distribute it independantly? > > Just a thought. hmmm, this would go into the Apache portable runtime (apr) issue, right? I don't think the code is that "good" splited from gw/ and gwlib/ to have it really seperated into cvs modules, IMO. But it's indeed an interesting idea. Other opintions about this?! Stipe mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 D�sseldorf, NRW, Germany phone: +49.211.74845.0 fax: +49.211.74845.299 mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de http://www.wapme-systems.de/ -------------------------------------------------------------------
