Hi, I'm also +1 but don't see a easy way to handle such things with CVS (and again my ++1 for subversion switch ;)).
Stipe Tolj wrote: > Hi list, > > I'd like to promote Rene Kluwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to gain cvs write > access in order to contribute his sqlbox as own cvs module. > > He is willing to put it under Kannel projection and maintain it inside the > cvs module. Which would also allow easier participation of other > developers in interest of it. > > So, we need at least 2 more +1 votes from core developers with cvs write > access to get hime going. Votes please. > > (Which does not mean others are forbidden to mention their votes as part > of an open way in decission making). > > @Rene: is there a clean way in how to treat the sqlbox cvs module as > add-on component to the core gateway module? Please have some thoughts on > this issue. Generally we should formalize on how such an add-on > configure/make/install process should look like. > > Stipe > > mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wapme Systems AG > > Vogelsanger Weg 80 > 40470 D�sseldorf, NRW, Germany > > phone: +49.211.74845.0 > fax: +49.211.74845.299 > > mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de > http://www.wapme-systems.de/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Thanks, Alex
