> Davy Chan wrote: > > > I might represent the extreme case of Kannel porting. I haven't > > seen anyone on the net talking about Kannel on an ARM7 processor > > (although we kind of talked about the possibility of Kannel on > > the Dragonball [a la Palm] or StrongARM [a la iPaq] in Hong Kong > > back in 2000). But, I'm sure crazy people like me are out there. > > I hope there are more of those outside too ;) > > > Don't think that limited resources are ONLY due to old equipment. > > Cost and space is another issue. You'ld be surprised at some > > places Kannel code has been embedded into. Ever wonder how some > > of those long-haul trucking companies keep track of their trucks? > > good example. > > Stipe
Indeed?? kannel is just so not embedded friendly, what with the separate processes as they are... if i were to embed something along these lines, i'd choose which i/f it be using smpp,whatever, and use that code, and build frm there, i don't see much anything else in kannel that i'd want.... and again we're talking about that damned lowest common denominator..... Please stick to where i bet most are using it,or want to use it, gateways to the telcos, and for large amount of traffic - spreading the load over multiple m/cs etc etc, ie the big picture!! isn't that why its "architected" the way it is?
