Hi,
I've been trying to compile kannel 1.4.0 with a non-gcc compiler, and
have a small pile of patches required to do so.
Anyway, here are the first two issues; is this the best place to
report them?
In radius/radius_pdu.c:
--- radius/radius_pdu.c 22 Jan 2004 14:08:25 -0000 1.1.1.1
+++ radius/radius_pdu.c 15 Feb 2005 15:02:32 -0000 1.1.1.1.2.1
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
int c = octstr_get_char(value, i);
Octstr *b = octstr_format("%d", c);
octstr_append(ret, b);
- i < 3 ? octstr_append_cstr(ret, ".") : NULL;
+ if (i < 3) octstr_append_cstr(ret, ".");
octstr_destroy(b);
}
break;
This is a syntax error that GCC will complain about with "-pedantic
-Wall", but the fix (as you can see) is simple enough. (It's a
syntax error because octstr_append_cstr has type "void", and NULL
isn't a void, but a deeply magic thing, so the two halfs of the ?:
have incompatible types).
Secondly, in gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c:
--- gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c 21 Oct 2004 12:33:40 -0000 1.1.1.2
+++ gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c 16 Feb 2005 11:04:07 -0000 1.1.1.2.2.2
@@ -1548,7 +1548,7 @@
}
}
debug("bb.sms.smpp", 0, "SMPP[%s]: %s: break and shutting
down",
- octstr_get_cstr(smpp->conn->id), __PRETTY_FUNCTION__);
+ octstr_get_cstr(smpp->conn->id), __func__);
break;
}
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is a GCCism. gw-config.h already has a construct to
define a replacement for the C99 __func__ macro if one is required, so
using that seems sensible (and increases portability to older versions
of gcc for free).
--
Mike Bristow - really a very good driver