mandag 21. mars 2005, 22:12, skrev Stipe Tolj:
> Hi Aarne,
>
> Arne K. Haaje wrote:
> > torsdag 24. februar 2005, 10:52, skrev Peter Buki:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I created a patch for smsc_cimd2.c, because on Nokia SMSCs
> >>the use of reply path parameter is often forbidden. The
> >>original version (1.4) included it in both cases, mine
> >>includes when it is needed (1).
> >>
> >>It is up to you if you include it or not :-)
> >
> > I am +0 on this.
> >
> > The reason it is there (set to 0) when not used, is because some phones
> > (try SonyEricsson T68) will automatically ask you to reply to an incoming
> > message if RPI is not set to 0.
>
> any final consensus here? should we commit this to cvs, or are you vetoing?
>
I don't think I can veto anything, but I stand by the above. If RPI is not set
to 0 some phones will ask the user to reply to all incoming messages.
I have used Kannel with CIMD2 against three operators, and none of those
operators have forbidden the use of RPI. After all the RPI parameter is a
part of the CIMD2 specs, so why should they?
--
Yours sincerely,
Eurobate ASA
Arne K. Haaje
Senior Network Engineer
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Eurobate ASA - Postboks 4589 Nydalen - 0404 Oslo - Norway
Phone: +47 23 22 73 73 - Fax: +47 23 22 73 74 - Mob: +47 92 88 44 66
http://www.eurobate.no/
