On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 04:41:14PM +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote: > no it's correct as is... gwthread_sleep allow you to pass negative value > e.g. -1 then thread will sleap without timout. when caller pass 0 to > gwthread_sleep then it's a bug in the caller but not library.
indeed. I think new (?) store_dumper() is the cause ... Regards, P.Y. Adi Prasaja
