Thomsen,

As I see, you are complaining about something that has nothing to be with 
Kannel documentation. What you need is an open protocol specification (PAP) 
whose scope is totally outside from Kannel. 

Take a look at the following URL, specially de Push Access Protocol and 
Service Indication specs:

http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/affiliates/wap/wapindex.html


BTW, I would understand if the Kannel developers feel offended with your 
words. Remember that you get what you pay for and if you don't like just stop 
using it.


Alberto




On Sunday 22 May 2005 18:51, J�rgen Thomsen wrote:
> Linkas,
>
> >I do agree. Kannel documentation has not been made for unexperienced
> >people and it needs some backgrounds.
>
> Unexperienced ?? Any system needs an interface description otherwise it is
> totally useless.
>
> This forum has a lot of people, whose names I find in the relevant code
> dated years back, but even if these names also appear in the documentation,
> their actual accomplishments there leave something to be desired in this
> case. Quoting the first sentence in the user guide "This document describes
> how to install and use Kannel,..."
>
> I can only say, that most programmers (myself included) find it much more
> fun coding new fancy features, but what use are these fancy features if the
> programmer is the only one knowing about this ?
>
> How about changing the Kannel project, so no new features are added unless
> there is also a user guide update accompanying the feature ?
>
> Isn't there a wish for the participants to have their work used by many
> people ? That can only be accomplished when a product is easy to use.
>
> >What I can suggest, after having studied on some sites, is to go to the
> >gateway folder and look for the examples in PHP about SI (Service
> >Indication) and then you will get it more.
>
> Bad suggestion. There is no PHP-code describing that. If you search for the
> term "Service Indication" you will find only 4 lines in the source files.
>
> I managed to deduce one interface as a HTTP POST with a MIME
> multipart/related part including two parts as the pap and si documents from
> the test_ppg code, but that is probably only a partial truth. This was
> after wasting several hours, which could have been avoided by a few lines
> in the documentation.
>
> Thank you, Kannel WAP programmers!
>
> I don't volunteer to update the documentation with this because, I don't
> know how complete and accurate my newly acquired knowledge is. Furthermore
> I find it more appropriate, that the persons actually having designed the
> interface finish their work.
>
> - J�rgen

Reply via email to