--- Alexander Malysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>+ privdata->rawtcp_host = cfg_get(cfg, octstr_imm("rawtcp-host"));
> >>>>+ if (cfg_get_integer(&portno, cfg, octstr_imm("rawtcp-port")) ==
> >
> >
> >>why do you introduce new config variables? why not just reuse already
> >>available 'host'/'port'?
> >
> >
> > because I thought it's inline with other syntax standards: there are
> > already variables like bearerbox-host, or http-proxy-host specifying some
> > remote entity. Besides, it's more explanative and tolerant to future
> > features which may also refer to some host/port information.
>
> yes and no. but in smsc group we try to keep config options low, so that
> user is not killed with all of them ;)
so what shall I do?
