Hey, On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 15:35 +0300, Enver ALTIN wrote: > Maybe we can introduce a generic-purpose field and use it for passing > SMSC-specific parameters to the SMSCConn via sendsms? Maybe we can > just let it in, and change the behavior later? I'm not really sure > which way is better.
Knock-knock. Testing. Can you hear me? :) -- .O. ..O Enver ALTIN | http://skyblue.gen.tr/ OOO Software developer @ Parkyeri | http://www.parkyeri.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
