Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
The Kannel group has been very reluctant in half-fixing this
problem over the past 4 years (look at the large number of
submitted patches that were refused). I'd find surprising that
the policy would change now :)
I'm very much in favor of a complete/full solution.
same with me... The problem is that it's not trivial.
And by having a generic discussion about it *NOW*, will have us on the way in
solving it.
Ok, can you express an architecture concept on how MSISDN scheme policy should
be handled?
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
