It is obvious, that you cannot have -MM flags with dual architecture,
because dependencies are different with
different archs. But is this flag necessary at all ? I can definitely
compile for ppc and i386, I just ignore warnings.
Aarno
On 13 Jan 2006, at 02:46, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Cesar Gutierrez Corea wrote:
Agree, I think it should detect the architecture and build for
that architecture, we could have separates binaries packages for
PowerPC and Intel for distribution. It would be convenient, for
example por DarwinPorts or Fink to have just one Universal
package that you can download and run on both platforms, but if
the conflicts with -M flag can't be solved I don't see the
problem of having 2 packages. Don't know how the rest of the open
source available for the Mac is going to handle this thing
Universal.
yep, I reverted the section, see ChangeLog:
2006-01-13 Stipe Tolj <stolj at kannel.org>
* configure[.in]: reverting changes from Andreas in rev 1.154 for
setting
both (i386 and ppc) architecture flags for darwin (MacOS X).
This causes
errors with -MM cfalgs and we should build for the architecture
we run.
Thanks to Cesar Gutierrez Corea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for his
reporting
and Aarno for investigating this issue further on.
[Msg-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
