Hi,

this is an SMSC generated error. If you look at the recent patches
sent by Peter Christensen, this error is no more "unknown":

+    SMPP_ESME_RSUBMITFAIL = 0x00000045,

+     case SMPP_ESME_RSUBMITFAIL:
+         return "Submit failed";

From my experience, such an error is raised by SMSC some agregators,g
UniqMinds PEAKm for example
(http://www.uniqminds.com/productsplatform.htm) and it's the reason is
about aggregator itself is going beyond the limits or something like
that.

So actually, 0x00000045 is not a fatal error, but similar to
"Throttling error" (0x00000058). The problem is that in the former
case Kannel en queues the failed SM, but in the first one it is not.
SMPP v3.4 says that 0x00000045 means "submit_sm or submit_multi
failed" so it sounds more like a "generic" error rather than temporary
one (when sending of SM should be retried).

Is it worth to think about the trivial patch which treats 0x00000045
as a temporary error, hence failed submit_sm will execute later as it
is for throttling error?

On 1/16/06, Mario Noboa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Stipe thanks for your reply, I'm sending a log in debug level of this
> error in the attached file.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mario
>
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: Domingo, 15 de Enero de 2006 21:17
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: [email protected]
> Asunto: Re: submit_sm failed
>
> Mario Noboa wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm connecting with a smsc some months ago. A few times I received this
> > message,
> >
> >
> >
> > 2006-01-14 16:12:31 [20418] [7] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated string
> > has no NULL.
> >
> > 2006-01-14 16:12:31 [20418] [7] ERROR: SMPP[CELUCOL]: SMSC returned error
> > code 0x00000045 (Unknown/Reserved) in response to submit_sm.
> >
> >
> >
> > But now this appears a lot of times in a day. I know this error means
> > "submit_sm or submit_multi failed".
> >
> >
> >
> > My question…. Do Kannel resend the message when this occurred?
>
> No, AFAIR this is considered as fatal error by the SMSC and the message is
> dropped. Kannel does try to resend the message _only_ for throttling errors.
>
> Can you please send us more from this suspicious SMPP SMSC as debug log
> level in
> attachement for review.
>
> Stipe
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kölner Landstrasse 419
> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>
> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
>
> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.18/230 - Release Date: 14/01/2006
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.18/230 - Release Date: 14/01/2006
>
>
>
>
>


--
Dziugas

Reply via email to