I just checked the Kannel http api sources. And the ssl parameters are not used at the moment. It shouldn't be too hard to implement. But I will leave it for another occasion. Let's first see if this patch gets accepted (or not).
Rene Kluwen Chimit -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: dinsdag 14 maart 2006 21:14 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Clickatell http driver patch Hi again, Rene Kluwen schrieb: > Hi Alex, > > As you suggested, I agree that we better move this thread to the ML. > I posted the patch to the users ML. I will attach it to this post again for > your convenience. > > I will fix your points 1, 2 & 4. Probably before the end of this week. > > About the authentication: Clickatell does not send a username or password > along. > But I will see if it is possible to make a check on api_id. > > Besides that, also connect-allow-ip can be used. From what I have heard from > the Clickatell techs, their callback HTTP farm connects from behind one > single IP address. not really good interface ;) (hint: ip spoofing) Their server should connect via https with username & pass... Thanks, Alex > > Cheers, > > Rene Kluwen > Chimit > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > alex - 03-14-06 19:31 GMT > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Rene, > I agree with you that we should support as much http interfaces as > possible. As to you patch... It's to hard to comment on this patch in > mantis. Please post it to ML and I will review it. At least now some > comments: > 1) please fix comments (they mention Brunet but your patch should support > Clickatell ;)) > 2) please kill commented blocks which are there due to copy&paste from > brunet /* e.g. XSER */ > 3) I don't see what should prevent me to send your MO message instead of > Clickatell server (not auth. for MO and DLR) > 4) minor: please fix coding style (indents) > > Thanks, > Alex > >
