Dear Tom, Yes, we had a long discussion on that issue. (check it on the archives) But the main problem is that the patch does't work when using prefix. We need to find a solution, but it's still pending...
The problem is located on the fact that EMI/UCP is using the same TS in a second. SMPP protocol seems to work in a different way (TS are unique) regards -- Telemaque - NICE - (FR) Service Technique - Developpement http://www.telemaque.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel : +33 4 93 97 71 64 (fax 68) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Sommer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:20 AM Subject: Request: rev. 1.11 to dlr_mysql.c > > Hello, > > I'm having problems with DLR reports getting mixed up. > Basically I am getting DLR where the contents of the ANSWER (%A) doesn't > match the number (%P). In the answer from the SMSC there is mentioned a > totally different number than the value of %P, which means the Answer > doesn't match the Number, which renders DLR useless. > > I noticed the only thing you use to differentiate which report URL goes > where, is the timestamp and the SMSC, this doesn't seem viable, since two > SMS sent from the same SMSC in the same second, would create conflicts. > > Looking at revision 1.11 of dlr_mysql.c, it seems this patch might solve > my problem, however it was backed out. > > Could you perhaps shed some light on this? > http://kannel.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gateway/gw/dlr_mysql.c.diff?r1=1.10&r2=1.11 > > Regards > -- > Tom Sommer > > > Regards > -- > Tom Sommer > http://tomsommer.dk > > >
