So how does this fit into the policy of strictly following SMPP specs?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stipe Tolj Sent: donderdag 1 juni 2006 20:48 To: Tom Sommer Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH] Typo in smsc_smpp.c Tom Sommer wrote: > Nasty typo that's been there for years > > Basically BUFFRED -> BUFFERD > > Patch attached commited to cvs in a variation. We'd go rather adding the "new" one then replacing, since Alex remembers that mblox uses this state string for the buffering state. So, as this is not a real issue from the SMPP spec itself, we need to relax on the possible typing. Thanks again. Stipe ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org -------------------------------------------------------------------
