Dear Christian, Thanks for your response, but we don't understand your answer, as we are not asking to use any of the other X-Kannel Wap Push HTTP headers as we don't use x-kannel-headers at all. Rather we have been using all the time the SMSPush equivalent parameters such as the "from" cgi parameter and would continue using those parameters.
However should this not be possible, thats fine, thanks for trying. Maybe you would be so kind as to send through an example in any computer language of how you send a WAP Push using x-kannel-headers so we can try your approach. We are still new to WAP Push and would rather if we have to, use your patch and move to using x-kannel-headers, in order to set the sender. This is a feature we have needed for a while and it could help many others. I hope they include it the Kannel CVS. Rgds > -----Original Message----- > From: Noor Entertainment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 July 2006 15:46 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Kannel Devel > Subject: Re: Extending the WAP patch > > > Hello Hillel, > > Thanks for your interest in this patch. > > My patch does not support setting the sender using the > "from" parameter. > > I had a quick look to see how this can be implemented. > It seems that this addition would be a bit intrusive; > adding "from" as a CGI parameter would implicitly > require adding support for the other X-Kannel Wap Push > HTTP headers as well; namely: X-Kannel-SMSC, > X-Kannel-DLR-Url, X-Kannel-DLR-Mask and > X-Kannel-Smsbox-Id. Otherwise, the kannel Wap Push API > won't stay consistent. > > So, I apologize for not being able to add this. > > Best regards. > > Christian. > > > > --- Hillel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Firstly thanks for submitting this patch as I've > > seen about 3 other Kannel > > users requesting such a patch on the devel list. > > > > Does your patch also support allowing one to set the > > WAP Push sender by > > using the SMSPush equivalent "from" parameter, > > rather than the > > 'X-Kannel-From' HTTP header, when submitting the WAP > > Push request to the > > Kannel PPG? > > > > If it does not support this, please would you > > consider adding this to your > > patch and re-submitting it to the devel list for > > those who don't use the > > X-Kannel Headers. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >
