Please unsubcribe me from this mailing list.

From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Alejandro Guerrieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Service routing based on the account field
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:27:13 +0200

Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:

Stipe, Rene,

We work with aggregators from around the world, and we are using many
flavors of the HTTP smsc modules (we even made a couple of modules to
support specific cases).

The scenario is exactly as you described it: The account field is used
to encode the "real" operator's smsc id, since the aggregator appears
to kannel as a single smsc.

Regarding architectural assumptions, I'll quote the user guide:

"%o account identifier/information of incoming message. The value
depends on the SMSC module and has been introduced to allow the
forwarding of an operator ID from aggregator SMSCs to the application
layer, hence the smsbox HTTP calling instance."

So it seems that this was one of the purposes for the account field.
It looked logic to me to be able to do some routing on it, so that's
why I've made that patch.

It works for us, maybe it's useful for other people. I don't think it
"hurts" to have this feature available, but I'm not the one deciding
here :)

Regarding criticism, don't be afraid, I won't get mad at it, all the contrary!

I don't pretend for you guys to include this patch in the core kannel at all.

I've just feel that it's a nice feature to have and maybe other people
are having similar scenarios as I do, so making it public could help
other kannel users.

YOU (meaning core kannel developers in general) have all the rights in
the world to decide what's right and what's not regarding kannel.

I think maybe other kannel users may benefit from this patch, and
maybe if you consider it's worth having it on the core could be
applied to CVS, but as I've said before, that wasn't the reason why
I've send it.

Hi Alejandro,

ok, since this is a generic "feature-add" and no behaviour change, I'd be +0 on getting this now to CVS.

Could you please resubmit the patch against current CVS and also include in the patch section for the user's guide explaining the logic arround it.

Simply send it again to devel@ list as new thread and I'll glance over it and commit.

Thanks.

Stipe

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/

mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------




Reply via email to