On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 10:03 +0200, Colin Pitrat wrote: > I added the -Wall option to CFLAGS, and I add a lot of warnings. I know > this doesn't mean that there are errors, but it could hide some. Maybe > it would be nice to enable this flag and to try to correct some of these > warnings don't you think ?
I tried to pursue this a while ago with no luck. I guess at the time gwlib was developed, gcc wasn't this smart to notice pointer signedness issues. If you try it with gcc 3.x, you won't see many warnings but it will spit out quite a lot of them with gcc 4.x. I remember guessing about roots of the problem, somewhere around the octstr code or even deeper. I wonder why Kannel did not use glib in the first place and reinvented the wheel. Licensing issues, maybe? Hrm. -- .O. ..O Enver ALTIN | http://enveraltin.com/ OOO Software developer @ Parkyeri | http://www.parkyeri.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
