Hi, when I replied to your post, I was referring to your thread regarding resend_try and sms_resend_frequency for split messages in particular:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg05943.html This has been never fixed until now even if we have separate threads for the same issue on the mailing list. @Stipe, @Alex? On 10/18/06, Josh McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually I have to eat some serious crow here. I checked out 1.41 instead of 1.4.1 and did a quick scan of the src for evidence of the patch and of course it wasn't in there. Got the appropriate 1.4.1 and it IS of course in there. Sorry for the false alarm. =/ Perhaps this should be highlighted in the Changes file though.? Thanks for getting it in! Josh > -----Original Message----- > From: Dziugas Baltrunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:59 AM > To: Josh McAllister > Cc: Kannel Devel > Subject: Re: configurable max retries forgotten in 1.41 =( > > Hi, Josh, > > I completely agree with you. This never ending retry mechanism is not > only flooding logs, but also causing tons of problems for those > involved in maintenance of SMSCs or SMPP servers. > > There is also one similar thread together with the bug report > "pending", you may take a lot at it here: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06060.html > > I would suggest to at least fix it in a "dirty" fashion rather then > waiting months for an "elegant" solution. > > On 10/17/06, Josh McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > To be frank, I'm amazed that this issue hasn't gotten more attention > > over the years given the default behavior of retrying immediately, and > > indefinitely. I don't know of any SMSC's that take kindly to that kind > > of behavior. > > > > I proposed a patch back in 7/05 that fixed this for smpp, followed by a > > more appropriate patch submitted (10/26/05) and later committed > > (11/8/05) by Alexander Malysh that fixed the problem for all protos. > > > > Is there a consensus that this is a critical issue? How is not a > > critical issue? What are the chances that we can get another release in > > the very near future? > > > > As always kudos to the devs, this really is a monster of a project. So > > many modalities, I can only imagine how difficult it is to keep up with > > it all. > > > > Josh McAllister > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Hillel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:53 AM > > > To: Kannel Devel > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: 3 patches seem to be forgotten > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > There are 3 patches that seem to be forgotten and we were wondered if > > they > > > can be added: > > > > > > 1)Noor Entertainment [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent in on Date: > > Wed, > > > 12 > > > Jul 2006 02:35:43 -0700 (PDT) > > > " Please find attached a small patch against > > > gateway/gw/wap_push_ppg.c allowing to set the Wap Push > > > sender by using the 'X-Kannel-From' HTTP header when > > > submitting the Wap Push request to the Kannel PPG" > > > > > > It was not sent with the word PATCH in front so maybe it was missed. > > > > > > 2)Colin Pitrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent in a patch and then > > refered to > > > it again on Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:24:40 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] empty SMS replaced by default message > > > > > > This can be useful if you need to send an empty SMS to a customer. > > > > > > 3)"Alexander Malysh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent in an awesome patch on > > > Date: > > > Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:35:37 +0200 with the Subject: [PATH] convert > > internal > > > charset to UTF-8. Becides the few changes from Peter this would be > > great > > > to > > > have in CVS, as it allows all the possible charset values. > > > > > > > > > Rgds > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Dziugas
-- Dziugas
