Errm... that should have been "semantic illegality" not semantically illegality :-). I'll get in touch with the operator and see. Thanks,
Ehi Rancard Solutions Ltd. web: www.rancardsolutions.com email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobile: +233.27.622.1212 office: +233.21.782.949 -----Original Message----- From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:49 PM Cc: 'Kannel Development list' Subject: Re: Destination address problem with 1.4.1 Ehizogie Binitie wrote: > Interesting .. but 1.4.0 does not break with the same "semantically > illegality" .. what's changed in 1.4.1 ..? yep, correct, was added post-1.4.0. > Does a work around exist ..? ??? either: a) SMSC does it the right way b) you need to force kannel to do it the wrong way (code change). In any case, I'd prefer a) in your case. :) Stipe ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.1/527 - Release Date: 11/9/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.1/527 - Release Date: 11/9/2006
