This is *NOT* true on UCP/EMI protocol for exemple.
Vincent.
--
Telemaque - 06560 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS - (FR)
Service Technique/Reseau - NOC
Developpement SMS/MMS/Kiosques
http://www.telemaque.fr/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel : +33 4 92 90 99 84 (fax 9142)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Georg von Zezschwitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andreas Fink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; "Alexander Malysh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL DLR speedup
Andreas Fink schrieb:
This was not about LIMIT 1 (there was a reason for that) but about
doing DELETE and SELECT in one statement.
The LIMIT 1 was a workaround in the error of EMI protocol not giving
unique timestamps.
the timestamp on a SMSC is not unique, not even for one destination
number.
Hi Andreas,
I believe and observed the opposite. The SMSC increments the timestamp -
even in the same second - if 2 messages are delivered to the same
destination number within the same second.
Are you really sure about this?
Georg
