Hi, On 12/3/06, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now, at least I totally agree that we need to change something here, since the modules act different, and we expect the msg->sms.udhdata to have the same value regardless which "smsc type" it used.
Only if we could ignore backwards compatibility issues, I would have removed the UDH length byte completely, but for now it's good to get Paul's patch in for the sake of consistency. Thanks, -- Enver
