Hi list,
 
I have problems when kannel has one releases message queue. The change of
store-spool maybe can help me.
 
This change is ready in the present cvs?

 

Thanks

Mario 

 

----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexander Malysh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: Problematic Kannel behaviour with large message stores
 
 
Hi,
 
will try todo it next week. I have it up to 80% ready with possibility to
select store file or store spool...
 
Thanks,
Alex
 
Vincent CHAVANIS wrote:
 
Alex,
 
Could you please review you patch to fit the actual CVS tree, as we can
test it.
Then, how it comes this patch does not have been commited as it was ++2
 
regards
 
Vincent
 
--
Telemaque - 06200 NICE - (FR)
Service Technique/Reseau - NOC
Developpement SMS/MMS/Kiosques
 <http://www.telemaque.fr/> http://www.telemaque.fr/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel : +33 4 93 97 71 64 (fax 68)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexander Malysh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: Problematic Kannel behaviour with large message stores
 
 
Hi,
 
you can search for my patch
 
(
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel/20690/match=spool>
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel/20690/match=spool)
that replaces store file with store spool directory. This works with
similar performance when you put your store dir on reiserfs or tmpfs
under linux. It would be great to hear test results for this patch.
Please note that patch is very old and could not apply that you should
fix manually.
 
Thanks,
Alex
 
Giulio Harding wrote:
 
We've been doing some more stress-testing of Kannel, this time under
high-load over long periods of time, an we've encountered some
problems when the message store grows large, of the order of hundreds
of thousands of messages (in our case, because we're delivering MTs
slower than we are receiving MOs, and due to the use of synchronous
responses to MO HTTP requests, the MTs are queuing at the bearerbox).
We understand that this is an extreme situation, and unlikely to be
encountered in normal usage, but we want to cover all our bases
(worst-case scenarios) and make sure that Kannel behaves correctly/
predictably in bad situations.
 
- It seems that reading from the message store during Kannel startup
is single-threaded, and CPU bound - for large stores (several hundred
thousand messages), this can result in very long start-up times,
since Kannel seems to not process any messages in the store until it
has finished reading them *all* into memory from disk.
 
- Why can't they simply be processed from disk? (i.e. read message
from disk, process message, read next message from disk) Given that
the messages are in a persistent store, why do they need to be in
memory as well?
 
- The bearerbox memory usage grows by around 100MB per hundred
thousand messages in the store, as the messages are read from the
store, which leads to VM thrashing under extreme circumstances, as
the bearerbox footprint grows beyond the RAM size of the server...
For one test, after the initial loading of ~634,000 MTs from the
store, and bearerbox was using ~780M of RAM. 1+ KB per message seems
a lot, given that messages seems to be occupying more space in memory
than on disk (that number of MTs was consuming about 255MB on disc)
 
- Once messages are read into memory, they seem to be copied into
another queue (this exacerbates the problem above) - why is this?

 

 

 

Reply via email to