Ok,
Slightly confused then, the SMSC rejected my message at submission,
and so I should have got back a dlr_mask value of 16 (dec) in the DLR
according to the documentation, but I got back 22 (dec). Maybe I
jumped to the wrong conclusion seeing the DLR_SMSC_FAIL set to 0x16
(22 dec) in the header file
#define DLR_SUCCESS 0x01
#define DLR_FAIL 0x02
#define DLR_BUFFERED 0x04
#define DLR_SMSC_SUCCESS 0x08
#define DLR_SMSC_FAIL 0x16
But does that not strike you as a bit odd though that they all match
the documentation with the exception of DLR_SMSC_FAIL, and looking at
them if you were reading them as dec numbers not hex they would
match. It really does look like a simple typo to me.
Anyway, if you figure out why I got 22 instead of 16 please let me know.
Regards
Ben
On 3 Apr 2007, at 14:35, Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi Ben,
your patch is not correct. You will receive SMSC_FAIL or DLR_FAIL
depending
on the dlr_mask you used. If you set dlr_mask to request SMSC_FAIL
then you
will receive it if only DLR_FAIL requested then DLR_FAIL will be set.
Ben Suffolk wrote:
Just noticed that when the SMSC rejects a message at submission the
dlr was set to 22 (0x16) not 16 (0x10). Just a bad define in the
header file.
Regards
Ben
--
Thanks,
Alex
