sort of :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Juan Nin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: Throughput patches
I guess then we're talking about some quite long term for this
modifications to take place, right?
On Nov 26, 2007 3:31 PM, Vincent CHAVANIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The main issue is located to the fact we are using the same thread in
order
to send/receive(=ack) a message.
We need to think about a global fix which result in modifying the actual
structure of kannel (=> implicates compatibility breaker)
I will take a look when i will have some time.
The main idea to temporatily fix thjis is to check for each msg, if they
have already been received.
If yes, then drop it. If not, insert it into your db.
Vincent
--
Telemaque - 06560 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS - (FR)
Service Technique/Reseau - NOC
Developpement SMS/MMS/Kiosques
http://www.telemaque.fr/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Juan Nin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: Throughput patches
> Hi!
>
> Any feedback on this?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Juan
>
> On Nov 16, 2007 12:35 PM, Juan Nin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I've been reading the different threads about the problem with
>> throughput, being this the last one (I think):
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06847.html
>>
>> Apparently that fixes the outgoing traffic throughput, but impacts
>> incoming ACKs.
>>
>> Is there any new version of the patch which fixes this, or any plans
>> on fixing it soon?
>> Seems to me to be something important, since many SMSCs limit their
>> inbound traffic, and not being able to correctly set the throughput
>> parameters is a big problem.
>>
>> Also, that patch is EMI/UCP specific and Stuart Beck ported it to
>> SMPP.
>> If there are intentions on fixing it on Kannel, will it be coded on
>> each smsc implementation, or will it be abstracted to some more global
>> place (don't know if it's possible)
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Juan
>>
>
>
