Hi Andreas, Thanks for the reply. The reason why I choose kannel is because I have been using kannel for more than 3 years and I like its architecture and simplicity, where we can manage most of everything via its config file and play with the source. Im doing the patches as Stipe has said.
Regards, Willy On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 15:48 +0100, Andreas Fink wrote: > I would say if you get it in HTTP in the first place, you dont need > kannel at all as kannel would end up in translating from http to http. > As far as I remember, only http outgoing sms from kannel is supported > but I remember someone who wanted to implement it incoming as MO. Not > sure if its done or not. > > On 05.01.2008, at 17:24, Willy Mularto wrote: > > > Hi, > > Im new in this kannel's development list. And I have situation where > > my telco requires a http connection with my server. I found that > > kannel supports this kind of connection, but unfortunatelly I must do > > some patches with kannel first. What I want to know is which files > > should be patched to accept MO from telco and send back the MT and > > also get the DLR from the telco. FYI, my telco send us a custom or > > additional parameters which carried during the MO and MT phase i.e > > http://url?msisdn=12345&sms=test&trxid=090807&ctype=1. Many thanks for > > your kind help and replies. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Willy >
