i'm trying to track the injected messages to sqlbox, but i just realized when 
inserting messages to send_sms  the tablefield id, which i fill with uniq ids 
(in order to be able to track this entry and update later the dlr status) are 
not inserted into the sent_sms table field called id.
does someone see a mistake in the idea?

Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:18:55 -0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: sqlbox kannel and scheduling

sqlbox sits inbetween smsbox and bearerbox, and catches all traffic going in 
and out. If you queue a message using the HTTP interface on smsbox, it will 
overgone the same DLR methods as before (if you use sql storage it will write 
an entry there and wait for the answer to update it).


I'm not sure about MT enqueuing directly on sqlbox, never tried it that way 
with DLR's.

Regarding scheduling, that would require a "WHERE" on the sql (eg, compare the 
"time" field with the local timestamp and only select messages where time >= 
timestamp). The way it is now (one query per message) could be overkill on 
large volumes, but with the patch for group selects and adding an index on the 
field could be easily implemented.


Regards,

Alejandro

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:52 PM, akif dinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:







the idea with scheduling was having the message send at a given time/date. like 
send message on the 12. of october 2008.
also one question i would like to ask is if how to find the relation between 
the sent message and the delivery report to it. i've a smpp connection and use 
sqlbox, it works for testing at the moment very well. before using sqlbox i 
updated via a self written php file a databasetable with the delivery report 
status. 

after using sqlbox do i have to keep track of the send messages or can sqlbox 
somehow do this for me?
i wonder if there is still need for futher db tables or if i can handle all 
with the existing sent_sms. where my needs would be restricted to know what 
status the message at the moment has (like delivered, pending, etc.)


thank you very much in advance,

Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:26:34 -0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: sqlbox kannel and scheduling

>From what I've learned from the source code, no, sqlbox reads messages one by 
>one (I've made a patch to retrieve batches of messages) without any kind of 
>sorting or scheduling.


So, if you insert 100K messages at once, they will be retrieved one by one and 
not necessarily on the same order of insertion.


The only scheduling you'll get is when messages are on the kannel's store 
(that's when sqlbox insert the messages to bearerbox).

Hope it helps,

Alejandro

2008/3/4 akif dinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:







hello,

does sqlbox support sheduling? 



Direkter Zugriff zu Hotmail und Messenger! Kostenloses Update für Ihren 
Internet Explorer!




-- 
Alejandro Guerrieri
Magicom
http://www.magicom-bcn.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/aguerrieri

Mit Live Search: Ihre Stadt in der Vogelperspektive! Erleben Sie neue 
Blickwinkel!



-- 
Alejandro Guerrieri
Magicom
http://www.magicom-bcn.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/aguerrieri

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live Fotogalerie: So einfach organisieren Sie Ihre Fotos!
http://get.live.com/photogallery/overview 

Reply via email to