ok, I'll try to sum up the discussion here:
- user side: git is available at most Linux flavors, but not directly to
other Unix/BSD flavors; git is still more developer affine then user
affine (my perspective on it)
- developer side: git makes life easier in terms that we can commit to
local repos and then "commit remotely" to the master (right?); branch
handling seems to be more effective (Guillaume and Alex claimed this).
My suggestion:
We move to svn on kannel.org, and leave the normal (anonymous) checkout
access to the master repository via svn.
Underneath we can switch to git for those developers who want to.
So a hybrid architecture would be possible IMO. Comments please?!
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
