Hi,

no objections -> commited to cvs.

Alexander Malysh schrieb:
Hi,

too much time passed since this post, but thanks to Stipe who pointed me to this post.

Attached is a patch that implements simple bandwidth meter with heuristic and needed changes to bearerbox status.

Bearerbox status show now 3 speeds: 1 minute sample, 5 minute sample, and over livetime.

Example:
SMS: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, outbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec

Comments please...

Thanks,
Alex

Alexander Malysh schrieb:
Hi,

I already implemented this in my tree, just give me some time to extract
this...

Rafael Alfaro wrote:

Hello Alex,

First of all, thanks  for your time,
Could you explain me a little bit about: "Simple bandwidth meter should do
it"? How is the best way to implement this?

Thanks in advance.

Rafael Alfaro.

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Alexander Malysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi Rafael,

-1 for this patch. You don't need yet another thread to do this. Simple
 bandwidth meter should do it...


 Rafael Alfaro wrote:

 > Hello Everybody,
 >
 > I did this patch with the following purpose:
 > Provide the bearerbox status web page with an online incoming and
 > outgoing sms rate display (msg/sec).
 >
 > For example, if you take a look to the current bearerbox status web
 > page, you will see that the sms rate is the average since the
 > bearerbox is online, because the current code is:
 >
 >         (float) counter_value(incoming_sms_counter)/t,
 >         (float) counter_value(outgoing_sms_counter)/t,
 >
 > So, I added a new feature to the core group cfg: "sms-rate-refresh".
 > This will launch a thread that will be sampling the
 > "counter_value(incoming_sms_counter)" and
 > "counter_value(outgoing_sms_counter)" every "sms_rate_refresh"
 > seconds, and with this information we can calculate the current sms
 > rate (msg/sec).
 >
 > If the "sms-rate-refresh" feature is not used at the configuration
 > file, by default, the average since bearerbox is online will be
 > displayed (like right now is coded).
 >
 > Best Regards,

 --
 Thanks,
 Alex







Reply via email to