Stipe Tolj schrieb:
Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com schrieb:
Hi
This patch was originally developed by me to add support for our needs
and we really needed that to work fast. We have tested it with very high
speeds and it had no impact on bearerbox delivery speeds.
I agree that the code isnt very clean and im going to update it this
week to provide cleaner output.
Alex can u explain your -1 on your side?
Alex is pedantic usually. Some experience this as "annoying", but generally it's
"protective" and makes sense. ;)
maybe ;)
The idea is as follows: we have urltrans where the whole keyword
handling magic already implemented and maintained. Then why should we
implement keyword mapping again in bb_boxc if we could reuse urltrans
logic or just extract keyword mapping logic from urltrans and use
extracted code in both bb_boxc and urltrans.
Hope now it's clear what I mean?
Illimar, sorry for missing the source. As mentioned in the PATCH mail, I simply
didn't recall.
Please if you have the time and want to contribute, please take Alex's
suggestion and work on the patch (please against CVS HEAD, not meta-data branch
;)
Stipe
