Alexander Malysh schrieb: > we have already callback infrastructure, it's called DLR :) > I don't see sense in this feature because all this could be done with > already implemented > and well known method DLR.
I object. This "can" be done with DLR, but "only" if DLRs are requested. It's still legitime to provide the assigned smsc-id in the ack msg back, even if NO DLR is requested. Yes, you could make the dlr-mask that way that you get only the "SMSC accepted the msg" DLR atually. But this implies we have doubling the load on the internal message bus between bearerbox and smsbox. That's not really effective IMO, as the ack msg is anyway passed back to the smsbox for the MT push and we simply ditch in another value. Stipe -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org -------------------------------------------------------------------
