[PATCH] ok, this is the diff for esm_class, configurable from meta-data, tested and working for me...

[Alvaro Talavera]

is only implemented for smpp, for now.. Here the diff.
Comments?




--- kannel-snapshot/gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c	2009-01-29 08:38:28.000000000  
-0300
+++ gateway-1.4.3-0.4/gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c	2009-03-28  
12:00:57.000000000 -0400
@@ -743,7 +743,9 @@
{
    SMPP_PDU *pdu;
    int validity;
-
+    Octstr *esm_class_default;
+       int esm_class_value;
+
    pdu = smpp_pdu_create(submit_sm,
                          counter_increase(smpp->message_id_counter));

@@ -854,10 +856,22 @@
        pdu->u.submit_sm.protocol_id = msg->sms.pid;

    /*
-     * set the esm_class field
-     * default is store and forward, plus udh and rpi if requested
+     * set the esm_class field from meta-data, if not set, the  
default value is asummed
+     * (Original: pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class =  
ESM_CLASS_SUBMIT_STORE_AND_FORWARD_MODE;)
+     * Alvaro Talavera (alvarot...@gmail.com) - www.puntopy.com
     */
-    pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class =  
ESM_CLASS_SUBMIT_STORE_AND_FORWARD_MODE;
+
+
+       if (msg->sms.meta_data != NULL &&
+		(esm_class_default = meta_data_get_value(msg->sms.meta_data,  
"smpp", octstr_imm("esm_class"))) != NULL) {
+                       esm_class_value = 
atoi(octstr_get_cstr(esm_class_default));
+			debug("bb.sms.smpp",0,"esm_class meta_data received, set in %i",  
esm_class_value);
+                       pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class = esm_class_value;
+       }else{
+               debug("bb.sms.smpp",0,"esm_class meta_data empty, set 
default.");
+               pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class = ESM_CLASS_SUBMIT_DEFAULT_SMSC_MODE;
+       }
+       
    if (octstr_len(msg->sms.udhdata))
        pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class = pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class |
            ESM_CLASS_SUBMIT_UDH_INDICATOR;