Did this patch has been tested ?


In file included from ./gwlib/gwlib.h:83,
                 from gw/msg.h:69,
                 from gw/sms.h:89,
                 from gw/sms.c:65:
./gwlib/gwmem.h:188:1: warning: "strdup" redefined
In file included from /usr/include/string.h:423,
                 from ./gwlib/gwlib.h:72,
                 from gw/msg.h:69,
                 from gw/sms.h:89,
                 from gw/sms.c:65:
/usr/include/bits/string2.h:1316:1: warning: this is the location of the 
previous definition


Vincent.


Alexander Malysh a écrit :
Hi again,

patch commited to cvs.

Thanks,
Alex

Am 06.04.2009 um 10:56 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:

Hi,
Here it goes. gw_calloc + gw_strdup. BR,
Nikos

    ----- Original Message -----
    *From:* Alexander Malysh <mailto:[email protected]>
    *To:* Andreas Fink <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Cc:* Nikos Balkanas
    <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Monday, April 06, 2009 10:26 AM
    *Subject:* Re: gwmem patches

    Hi Nikos,

    we have at least one +1 so please repost your patch.

    Thanks,
    Alex

    Am 03.04.2009 um 17:37 schrieb Andreas Fink:

    I'm +1 on gw_calloc. There's a few times I would have used it in
    the past so its nice to have it in gwlib.

    I see very little optimisation of strdup except we do a strlen
    twice (once explicit in the malloc line an done implicity in the
    strcpy) but it is never bad to save a few microseconds.. (who
    knows one might call this one a gazillion times...). so +1 for
    that one too.


    On 02.04.2009, at 23:21, Alexander Malysh wrote:

    Hi,

    thanks for your patch but:

    1) thread.h patch was wrong. I fixed it in CVS.
    2) gw_strdup optimisation looks OK, please submit as extra patch
    3) gw_calloc, hmm... I don't really see any advantage of this
    one. because
    x = gw_malloc(count*size);
    memset(x, 0);
        do the same. why do we need this?

    Thanks,
    Alex

    Am 02.04.2009 um 19:09 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:

    Hi,
An assortment of small patches to make check_memory_leaks work
    better:
1) Added support for gw_calloc, which is #undefed but not defined
    2) Replaced strcpy with memcpy in gw_strdup for better efficiency
    3) Added function prototype in thread.h for mutex_make_measured
    so that MUTEX_STATS compile correctly.
Please decide and vote. BR,
    Nikos<kannel.diff>



<kannel.diff>


--
Telemaque - 06560 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS - (FR)
Service Technique/Reseau - NOC
Direction du Developpement xMS+
http://www.telemaque.fr/
[email protected]
Tel : +33 4 92 90 99 84 (fax 9142)


Reply via email to