Ignore my last mail! I see these will be called per thread :)
2009/6/9 Donald Jackson <donaldjs...@gmail.com> > I will review in more detail when I get a moment, my concern here is that > you are now sleeping at the bearerbox layer which could effect delivery to > other SMSC's. > > The current throughput limits although the logic is per-smsc, they sleep > within their own threads as to not delay any others. > > Have you addressed this scenario? > > 2009/6/9 Damián Viano <damian.vi...@buongiorno.com> > > Hi list: >> >> I've seen kannel not respect throughput at all, at least with the >> fakesmsc >> and looking around find the following bug: >> >> http://redmine.kannel.org/issues/show/332 >> >> With the following patch attached: >> >> http://redmine.kannel.org/attachments/104/0000332-emi_patch_ack_v3.txt >> >> Inspired by that one, I've implemented a smsc-independent throughput >> patch. The >> idea is to enforce the throughput from the beaberbox side instead of >> having to >> implement the same login in every smsc. This is possible due to the >> bb_smscconn_sent() and bb_smscconn_send_failed() callbacks from the smscs >> implementation. They MUST call one of this callbacks after sending a >> message >> either successfully(_sent) or with failure(_failed), so we can make them >> sleep >> there, making sure they NEVER go over the configured throughput. >> >> There's only one downside to this smsc-independent approach which is that >> we >> don't, and can't (without cluttering the interface, AFAIK) know how much >> time >> the smsc takes in actually sending the sms, so we assume it takes nothing, >> this >> would, practically give us a somewhat smaller real throughput, but I >> though >> that's better than the previous behaviour (which for me, flooded the >> smsc). >> >> I've only tested this with fakesmsc so far, and only commented out the >> previous >> throughput implementation in that smsc, doing the rest is trivial and I >> can do >> it (or anyone else can), but this first iteration is to gather opinions >> about >> this approach. >> >> Once again the patch is against the current stable release, I can update >> it if >> needed, just let me know. >> >> Again I would love comments, questions, commits, rants, whatever :) >> >> For reference: >> diffstat kannel-1.4.3-throughput.patch >> bb_smscconn.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> smsc/smsc_fake.c | 9 +++++++-- >> smscconn_p.h | 2 ++ >> 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> Hope to help. >> >> Damián Viano(Des). >> >> P.D.: Also there's an info line in smsc_fake.c to count the number of sms, >> which should be removed from the final version, is only there for >> debugging >> purposes. >> > > > > -- > Donald Jackson > http://www.ddj.co.za/ > donaldjster(a)gmail.com > -- Donald Jackson http://www.ddj.co.za/ donaldjster(a)gmail.com
