The subject was "access log format" isn't it? Please focus on that
part and address whatever other personal issues you may have to Nikos
directly.
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
[email protected]
On 19/09/2009, at 8:17, Alok Vaidya wrote:
Hi Nikos,
I guess whom you are addressing then when you say "Alok's way is
superoir....". I always get the facts straight and never comment on
anything before making sure, unlike you.
Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Hi,
You are mistaken. I am not taunting you, not even addressing you.
Please get your facts straight before you mail insults.
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: Alok Vaidya
To: Nikos Balkanas
Cc: Guillaume Cottenceau ; [email protected]
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: access log format
Hi Nikos,
I ain't sure where you are taking this, but I guess I know, so if
you are hurling taunts about anything I suggest you find someone
else, as you have completely misunderstood my requirement and my
question here in the first place.
I ain't interfering with Kannel's DLR handling at all we have been
using kannel for 3 years now and I guess that much time is enough
to know about any software what it does good or bad. I never said
we were talking about DLR's god knows from where you got that notion.
We do not use the smsbox but a proprietary smppbox (licensed from
Stipe Tolj) and we parse the log records whether MT or MO to get
the information about messages and their delivery reports from log
files to db.
Yes I am aware about the dlr-url feature of smsbox to get dlr HTTP
Posted back to me, but as mentioned above we do it other way.
Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Hi,
Alok's way is superior to kannel's DLR handling. It inserts to the
DB much more information about the original message than can be
obtained through the DLRs alone and passed on to the dlr-url.
If anyone has reduced the resolution of the logs, I am sure it was
unintentional.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message ----- From: "Guillaume Cottenceau"
<[email protected]>
To: "Alok Vaidya" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: access log format
Alok Vaidya <alok 'at' routesms.com> writes:
Hi,
Sorry I didn't get you.
Are you programmatically looking for sent/failed SMS by looking
at Kannel logs?
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Alok Vaidya <alok 'at' routesms.com> writes:
Hi,
Thanks for replying. Yes I checked the documentation we
can certainly have a
custom format, but it is about the events that I talking
here like "Sent SMS"/
"FAILED SMS"/"Discarded SMS" etc., I see some changes
there. Mostly I have
figured them out but, I fail to understand some other
entries which I have
mentioned below as also I want to know more such changes.
Let me elaborate why this causes problems. Our parser
uses patterns such as
"Failed SMS" to search for current (14.2 box) entries,
now this event logging
has changed to "FAILED SEND SMS" naturally this will not
be picked up and hence
we loose on such entries. That's my point here.
I might be a little off topic, but why not using the mechanism
made for that kind of things, e.g. receiving delivery reports
from Kannel? It is supported, lets you ask what information
you
need, and is of course "supported" accross versions.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau
<alok.vcf>
