HI,

this will break backwards compatibility... Why do you change this and not just 
put it into meta-data?
something like ?cimd2?errorcode=XXX ?

meta-data was designed for such things...

Thanks,
Alexander Malysh

Am 12.04.2010 um 17:57 schrieb Kyriacos Sakkas:

> Hi,
> 
> Sorry  for the cross-posting,, was looking at finding an existing
> solution, as well as comments on the diff. I should be able to comment
> better on stability and function on this patch tomorrow.
> 
> Kyriacos
> 
> On 12/04/2010 18:16, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
>> Hi Kyriaco,
>> 
>> Such issues are best addressed to devel group. Please do not x-post,
>> people are sensitive here about keeping mail low.
>> 
>> This is a change that affects only the CIMD2 driver. I see no problem
>> with it, as long as the rest of the CIMD2 users agree with it.
>> Personally I use only SMPP so I vote OK, but my vote shouldn't count :-)
>> 
>> BR,
>> Nikos
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kyriacos Sakkas"
>> <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>; "Kannel Devel" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 5:47 PM
>> Subject: Re: CIMD DLRs, reading field 062
>> 
>> 
>>> I have taken this live and it seems to be working ok.
>>> 
>>> Kyriacos
>>> 
>>> On 12/04/2010 16:36, Kyriacos Sakkas wrote:
>>>> This should be a bit better :)
>>>> 
>>>> Kyriacos
>>>> 
>>>> On 12/04/2010 16:26, Kyriacos Sakkas wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> What do you think of this? I will try it, but wondering if anyone
>>>>> things
>>>>> this will not work. I know this is not a proper solution, but it
>>>>> should
>>>>> be OK.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kyriacos
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 12/04/2010 16:01, Kyriacos Sakkas wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This question has been posted before, but I have not seen any
>>>>>> solutions.
>>>>>> I need to receive CIMD2 field 062 in my DLR urls. None of the %*
>>>>>> options
>>>>>> seems to return it, even embedded in other info.
>>>>>> As far as I understand the meta-data TLV system is SMPP only, and
>>>>>> will
>>>>>> not provide a solution.
>>>>>>> From my system %A returns field 061 and %d the SMPP?
>>>>>>> mapping/equivalent
>>>>>> of field 061.
>>>>>> Could some small change alter this so that %A returns 062 which is
>>>>>> to my
>>>>>> understanding closer to the extra error info returned in SMPP DLRs.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kyriacos Sakkas
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Kyriacos Sakkas
>>> Development Team
>>> Netsmart
>>> Tel: + 357 22 452565
>>> Fax: + 357 22 452566
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> http://www.netsmart.com.cy
>>> 
>>> Taking Business to a New Level!
>>> 
>>> ** Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email
>>> message may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution,
>>> or copying of this  email message is strictly prohibited.
>>> If you think that you have received this email message in error, please
>>> email the sender at [email protected] **
>>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kyriacos Sakkas
> Development Team
> Netsmart
> Tel: + 357 22 452565
> Fax: + 357 22 452566
> Email: [email protected]
> http://www.netsmart.com.cy
> 
> Taking Business to a New Level!
> 
> ** Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email
> message may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution,
> or copying of this  email message is strictly prohibited.
> If you think that you have received this email message in error, please
> email the sender at [email protected] **
> 


Reply via email to