Actually, delaying a sequential message to same destination isnt such a bad idea because: 1) people cant read messages that fast 2) a lot of carriers have thresholds for destination addresses 3) if you have 1000 recipients with 10 messages to each , they will start getting messages faster if you throttle each one of them respectively (unless, of course, you have no speed limitations on carrier side)
Implementation isnt easy though, thats true Regards, Konstantin On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Vincent CHAVANIS <[email protected]>wrote: > > Le 24/06/2010 17:23, Nikos Balkanas a écrit : > > I see. But there is nothing you can do in such a case, so it is not an >> issue. The patch attempts just to make things better for EMI, not worse. >> Anyway, how frequent is that you get subsequenty pushes to the same dst >> from the account? >> > > For all services that need to send more than 1 messages to deliver the > content > without using concatenated-messages. > Also for carriers, the "welcome messages" when you are in "roaming", > they are sending 3 msgs for the same dst. (imagine if you need to delay > 1sec for each msg...) > > > Vincent. > > -- > Telemaque - 06560 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS - (FR) > Service Technique/Reseau - NOC > Direction du Developpement xMS+ > http://www.telemaque.fr/ > [email protected] > Tel : +33 4 92 90 99 84 (fax 9142) > > >
